I love those simple cheap rotary encoders as used in the KY-040 modules as a method of getting user input with Arduino and ESP32 projects. The issue of bounce with them is significant and for years I’ve been looking a reliable method of dealing with it. I thought I had it figured out by either using a couple of 100nF capacitors or by using code ignore quick changes but this was not always reliable and sometimes missed legitimate changes when rotating at speed. In forums I read people recommending to use a lookup table, but not me. I persevered with what I knew, at least until my methods didn’t work.
I’ve only recently started using ESP32s. The first time I started using one with an encoder the bouncing was terrible. Turning a single indent resulted in a large number of false increments. I assumed that this was because the ESP32 was so running much faster than the Nanos I’ve been using and triggering on even quicker bounces. I don’t know if that is a possibility, but I now believe that the encoder I was using was extremely noisy. I thought it was time to revisit debouncing. After all a reliable encoder will not necessarily stay reliable forever.
An alternative solution
In some forums I read there was sometimes a comment saying there was a more reliable way. That is to use a table to compare the previous state with the new state and using a lookup table to ignore those changes that are not valid for a legitimate change. I decided to investigate. I came across this page Rotary Encoder : How to use the Keys KY-040 Encoder on the Arduino. I recommend reading it if you want to learn more about it.
I tried the Code For Improved Table Decode and was really surprised just how well it worked without any hardware filtering. There were only two things missing that I wanted. Firstly, it uses polling and I wanted to use interrupts and secondly it has a copyright notice and I respect that. However, I want to use code that I can include in projects that I can place online to share with others. It’s still a great read and I am grateful for Best Microcontroller Projects for providing the resource.
Next I came across code by Oleg Mazurov’s pages Reading rotary encoder on Arduino and Rotary encoder interrupt service routine for AVR micros
I also found these to be very helpful. I found some others had similar code that I believe is based on the code by Oleg. Oleg’s code worked well too, but I couldn’t get it to work on the ESP32 without a couple of changes. It uses port read to read the value of the encoder pins, which I expect is a very efficient thing to do, but didn’t work with the ESP32. Also, the interrupt version uses PROGMEM that also appears to be incompatible with the ESP32, or at least as it is done in the example.
However, you can stop here and use Oleg’s code if you are using a Nano or Uno, or use the Best-Microcontroller-Projects.com version. To get Oleg’s version working on the ESP32 I made these changes.
Port read
Olig’s code reads the ports directly without using Arduino’s digitalRead. I had a go at using digitalRead, which I hoped would allow it to work on the ESP32 and perhaps other microcontrollers. To do that I:
Removed this define
define ENC_PORT PINCAnd changed this:
old_AB |= ( ENC_PORT & 0x03 ); // Add current state to this to use digitalRead:
if (digitalRead(ENC_A)) old_AB |= 0x02; // Add current state of pin A
if (digitalRead(ENC_B)) old_AB |= 0x01; // Add current state of pin BProgmem
I’m not sure why program memory is used instead of SRAM, only that I couldn’t get it to work on the ESP32 so I removed the reference to it making it the same as Oleg’s polling version. So from this:
static const int8_t enc_states [] PROGMEM = {0,-1,1,0,1,0,0,-1,-1,0,0,1,0,1,-1,0};To this:
static const int8_t enc_states[] = {0,-1,1,0,1,0,0,-1,-1,0,0,1,0,1,-1,0};Changed versions
I confess to not fully understanding the code, so I can’t be sure that there are not issues with it. I have made some other tweaks too, but those are mainly just the addition of comments. These are the two versions that I am currently using.
Polling version
/* Based on Oleg Mazurov's code for Reading rotary encoder on Arduino, here
https://chome.nerpa.tech/mcu/reading-rotary-encoder-on-arduino/ and here
https://chome.nerpa.tech/mcu/rotary-encoder-interrupt-service-routine-for-avr-micros/
This example does not use the port read method. Tested with Nano and ESP32
Connections
===========
Encoder | ESP32 | Nano
--------------------------
A | D5 | Nano D2
B | D21 | Nano D3
GND | GND | GND
*/
// Define rotary encoder pins
#define ENC_A 21
#define ENC_B 5
volatile int counter = 0;
void setup() {
// Set encoder pins
pinMode(ENC_A, INPUT_PULLUP);
pinMode(ENC_B, INPUT_PULLUP);
// Start the serial monitor to show output
Serial.begin(115200); // Change to 9600 for Nano, 115200 for ESP32
delay(500); // Wait for serial to start
Serial.println("Start");
}
void loop() {
static int lastCounter = 0;
read_encoder();
// If count has changed print the new value to serial
if(counter != lastCounter){
Serial.println(counter);
lastCounter = counter;
}
}
void read_encoder() {
// Encoder routine. Updates counter if they are valid
// and if rotated a full indent
static uint8_t old_AB = 3; // Lookup table index
static int8_t encval = 0; // Encoder value
static const int8_t enc_states[] = {0,-1,1,0,1,0,0,-1,-1,0,0,1,0,1,-1,0}; // Lookup table
old_AB <<=2; // Remember previous state
if (digitalRead(ENC_A)) old_AB |= 0x02; // Add current state of pin A
if (digitalRead(ENC_B)) old_AB |= 0x01; // Add current state of pin B
encval += enc_states[( old_AB & 0x0f )];
// Update counter if encoder has rotated a full indent, that is at least 4 steps
if( encval > 3 ) { // Four steps forward
counter++; // Increase counter
encval = 0;
}
else if( encval < -3 ) { // Four steps backwards
counter--; // Decrease counter
encval = 0;
}
}Interrupt version
/* Based on Oleg Mazurov's code for rotary encoder interrupt service routines for AVR micros
here https://chome.nerpa.tech/mcu/reading-rotary-encoder-on-arduino/
and using interrupts https://chome.nerpa.tech/mcu/rotary-encoder-interrupt-service-routine-for-avr-micros/
This example does not use the port read method. Tested with Nano and ESP32
both encoder A and B pins must be connected to interrupt enabled pins
Connections
===========
Encoder | ESP32 | Nano
--------------------------
A | D5 | Nano D2
B | D21 | Nano D3
GND | GND | GND
*/
// Define rotary encoder pins
#define ENC_A 21
#define ENC_B 5
volatile int counter = 0;
void setup() {
// Set encoder pins and attach interrupts
pinMode(ENC_A, INPUT_PULLUP);
pinMode(ENC_B, INPUT_PULLUP);
attachInterrupt(digitalPinToInterrupt(ENC_A), read_encoder, CHANGE);
attachInterrupt(digitalPinToInterrupt(ENC_B), read_encoder, CHANGE);
// Start the serial monitor to show output
Serial.begin(115200); // Change to 9600 for Nano, 115200 for ESP32
delay(500); // Wait for serial to start
Serial.println("Start");
}
void loop() {
static int lastCounter = 0;
// If count has changed print the new value to serial
if(counter != lastCounter){
Serial.println(counter);
lastCounter = counter;
}
}
void read_encoder() {
// Encoder interrupt routine for both pins. Updates counter
// if they are valid and have rotated a full indent
static uint8_t old_AB = 3; // Lookup table index
static int8_t encval = 0; // Encoder value
static const int8_t enc_states[] = {0,-1,1,0,1,0,0,-1,-1,0,0,1,0,1,-1,0}; // Lookup table
old_AB <<=2; // Remember previous state
if (digitalRead(ENC_A)) old_AB |= 0x02; // Add current state of pin A
if (digitalRead(ENC_B)) old_AB |= 0x01; // Add current state of pin B
encval += enc_states[( old_AB & 0x0f )];
// Update counter if encoder has rotated a full indent, that is at least 4 steps
if( encval > 3 ) { // Four steps forward
counter++; // Increase counter
encval = 0;
}
else if( encval < -3 ) { // Four steps backwards
counter--; // Decrease counter
encval = 0;
}
}Downsides of this method
While it is working well in tests, I have not used it in a permanent project yet. The only downside I can find so far is that if using interrupts instead of polling it requires two interrupt pins. Other methods I’ve used only need one. I don’t expect this will be an issue of the ESP32 but it may be with the Nano.
